RPG Enterprises Chairman Harsh Goenka initially criticized L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s proposal for a 90-hour work week, but later praised L&T’s contributions to India’s infrastructure. Goenka’s about-face sparked further debate about work-life balance and employee well-being, highlighting a crucial conversation on workplace culture and productivity.
A food delivery company offered a humorous response to the ongoing debate about excessively long work hours, sparked by comments from a prominent business leader who advocated for a 90-hour work week. This has reignited conversations surrounding work-life balance and the potential negative impacts of prioritizing work over personal well-being. The incident highlights the need for a healthy balance between professional success and personal life.
Larsen & Toubro chairman S.N. Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week has sparked a huge backlash, with many criticizing the lack of work-life balance. Harsh Goenka, RPG Enterprises chairman, joined the debate, humorously highlighting the unrealistic demands and potential for burnout. This incident has reignited discussions about the importance of a healthy work-life balance in the corporate world, echoing previous similar controversies.
L&T Chairman’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week has sparked a debate on work-life balance. Several industry leaders have countered this view, emphasizing the importance of a 5-day work week and the negative impact of excessive hours on employee well-being and productivity. The discussion has involved concerns from various sectors, and political action has been initiated to penalize any violations of work hour laws.
L&T Chairman S N Subrahmanyan’s remarks on a 90-hour work week sparked a nationwide debate. His comments, criticized by many, including actress Deepika Padukone, ignited discussions on work-life balance and mental health. Shiv Sena MP Milind Deora offered a nuanced view, highlighting generational differences in work ethics. The debate touches on broader issues surrounding work culture, societal expectations, and the need for a balanced approach.
L&T chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week has sparked widespread outrage. His comments, deemed misogynistic and exploitative by many, including Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, have fueled a debate about work-life balance and corporate culture. The controversy has drawn comparisons to similar statements by Infosys co-founder Narayan Murthy, and prompted reactions from business leaders and celebrities alike.
Larsen & Toubro chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week, including Sundays, has sparked outrage. His comments, including a question about what employees do at home with their wives, have been widely criticized. Social media users have responded with memes and criticism, highlighting the contrast to global trends towards better work-life balance. L&T defended the chairman, linking his proposal to nation-building. The incident ignited discussions on work-life balance, employee well-being, and ethical corporate leadership.
Larsen & Toubro chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week, including Sundays, sparked outrage online. His remarks, which questioned employees’ activities at home, reignited the work-life balance debate. L&T clarified that the statement reflected ambition for India’s economic growth, while the online discussion drew comparisons to PM Modi’s work ethic and the need for adequate compensation for extended work hours.
L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week sparked controversy, drawing criticism from Bollywood actor Deepika Padukone and others. His remarks, echoing similar comments from other business leaders, sparked debate about work-life balance and mental health. L&T clarified that the comments aimed to emphasize the need for extraordinary effort for exceptional outcomes.
Larsen & Toubro clarified its chairman’s remarks about a 90-hour work week, explaining it reflected India’s ambition for extraordinary achievements. The company stressed its commitment to a culture of passion, purpose, and performance, while acknowledging the need for dedication in national development. The clarification aimed to address concerns about potential misinterpretations and emphasize the broader context of India’s growth aspirations.
