Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge criticized L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour workweek, contrasting it with the historical eight-hour workday advocated by Nehru and Ambedkar. Subrahmanyan’s comments sparked a debate on work-life balance, drawing criticism for their apparent disregard for employee well-being. Kharge’s response highlights the ongoing discussion about fair labor practices and the importance of employee health and work-life integration.
Amul’s latest doodle satirizes L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour workweek, including Sundays. Subrahmanyan’s comments sparked a national debate about work-life balance, prompting Amul’s witty response. This controversy follows similar remarks from other business leaders, highlighting the ongoing tension between productivity and employee well-being in India’s corporate landscape.
L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s proposal for a 90-hour workweek has sparked a heated online debate about work-life balance. His comments, along with Elon Musk’s past remarks on work hours, have ignited discussions on productivity versus employee well-being. While some support longer hours, others emphasize quality over quantity, highlighting the ongoing tension between professional ambitions and personal life.
RPG Enterprises Chairman Harsh Goenka initially criticized L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s proposal for a 90-hour work week, but later praised L&T’s contributions to India’s infrastructure. Goenka’s about-face sparked further debate about work-life balance and employee well-being, highlighting a crucial conversation on workplace culture and productivity.
L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s remarks advocating for a 90-hour workweek and suggesting employees should spend less time with their families sparked a viral controversy. His comment, “How long can you stare at your wife?”, ignited a social media firestorm of memes and jokes, reigniting debates about work-life balance. Other industrialists and celebrities joined the conversation, highlighting the ongoing discussion about workplace culture and expectations.
The comments made by Larsen & Toubro chairman SN Subrahmanyan, advocating for 90-hour work weeks, have sparked widespread criticism from political figures. TMC MP Mahua Moitra and other MPs have condemned the proposal, highlighting the importance of work-life balance. This has reignited the debate on work ethics and employee well-being in the corporate world, leading to calls for regulatory action and stricter labor laws.
L&T chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week has sparked widespread outrage. His comments, deemed misogynistic and exploitative by many, including Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, have fueled a debate about work-life balance and corporate culture. The controversy has drawn comparisons to similar statements by Infosys co-founder Narayan Murthy, and prompted reactions from business leaders and celebrities alike.
Larsen & Toubro chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week, including Sundays, has sparked outrage. His comments, including a question about what employees do at home with their wives, have been widely criticized. Social media users have responded with memes and criticism, highlighting the contrast to global trends towards better work-life balance. L&T defended the chairman, linking his proposal to nation-building. The incident ignited discussions on work-life balance, employee well-being, and ethical corporate leadership.
Larsen & Toubro chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s suggestion of a 90-hour work week, including Sundays, sparked outrage online. His remarks, which questioned employees’ activities at home, reignited the work-life balance debate. L&T clarified that the statement reflected ambition for India’s economic growth, while the online discussion drew comparisons to PM Modi’s work ethic and the need for adequate compensation for extended work hours.
L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan’s ₹51 crore annual salary, 535 times more than the average employee’s, has sparked controversy. His support for a 90-hour workweek further fuels the debate about executive compensation and income inequality in India. The substantial pay gap raises questions about corporate governance and employee well-being.
