The Russian media has been intensely following the Democratic National Convention, providing extensive coverage and analysis of the US presidential election campaign. This intense interest is not simply about who might pursue a more favorable policy towards Russia but rather a strategic assessment of which team would be better or worse for America. The logic being, if America weakens, Russia benefits.
The Russian intelligence services, which influence President Vladimir Putin’s policies, have concluded that Washington’s stance against Russia remains consistent regardless of whether Republicans or Democrats are in power. Their focus, therefore, shifts to understanding which team, in this case, Harris-Walz or Trump-Vance, would be more detrimental to America’s stability and prosperity.
Specifically, the Russian media has paid considerable attention to Governor Tim Walz, Harris’s running mate, portraying him as a champion of progressive values, including support for abortion, illegal immigration, and gun control. They even celebrated his advocacy for LGBT rights, contrasting this with Russia’s restrictive stance on the issue.
In contrast, the GOP vice presidential candidate, JD Vance, received limited coverage, primarily focusing on his perceived pro-Ukrainian stance and his belief that China, not Russia, is the primary threat. This suggests that Russia views Vance as potentially less detrimental to their interests than Walz.
The Russian media’s analysis ultimately paints a picture of a Harris-Walz presidency leading to progressive extremism, socialism, crime, illegal immigration, and economic devastation. This, they believe, would be a positive outcome for Russia, which has witnessed the destructive nature of socialism through the fall of the USSR.
While Russia’s focus on the US election is rooted in self-interest, it highlights a significant concern: the potential for an American government policy that could lead to instability and weaken the country. It also underscores the importance of Americans carefully evaluating the candidates and their policies in the upcoming election.
