In a dramatic turn of events, the Israeli Army declared the death of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah on Friday. The news, confirmed by the Lebanese group itself, sent shockwaves through the region and beyond. Reports indicate that the attack involved a barrage of approximately 85 bunker-buster bombs, designed to penetrate deep into the ground before detonating. These powerful munitions, also known as ground penetration munitions, can weigh between 2,000 and 4,000 pounds and are capable of penetrating up to 30 meters of earth or six meters of reinforced concrete.
The use of such bombs, specifically designed to target hardened structures like military bunkers, has raised concerns about potential collateral damage. These bunker-busters, loaded with explosives and equipped with a delayed fuse, create shockwaves powerful enough to collapse nearby structures. The Geneva Convention, recognizing the inherent risks of mass casualties, outlaws the use of such weapons in densely populated areas.
The concept of bunker-buster munitions dates back to World War II, with the development of Röchling shells by German engineer August Coenders. These advanced artillery pieces, utilizing increased sectional density for enhanced penetration, were tested in 1942 and 1943 at the Belgian Fort d’Aubin-Neufchâteau.
This latest development has sparked a global debate, with experts speculating about the potential consequences for the region and beyond. Political analyst Al-Arian, speaking to Al Jazeera, suggested that Israel might be aiming for a regional war, particularly given the timing of the attack, just a few weeks before the US presidential elections. He believes Israel’s actions might be an attempt to draw the United States into the conflict.
Al-Arian further suggested that Israel has a strong interest in degrading Iran’s power, specifically targeting its nuclear program. While there is no concrete evidence of Iran possessing a nuclear weapon, he acknowledged that Iran possesses the capability to develop one rapidly, particularly with its recent uranium enrichment activities.
The expert noted that the decision of whether or not to develop a nuclear weapon remains unclear for Iran. He also raised the possibility that Iran might have been waiting to develop the weapon before escalating the situation, though this remains speculation.
The unfolding events highlight the complex dynamics in the region and the potential for a major escalation. The use of powerful bunker-buster bombs, combined with the possible involvement of Iran, has created a volatile situation with potentially far-reaching consequences.
