In a move that has sparked debate, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill designed to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), citing concerns that it could stifle innovation. The decision came after significant lobbying from major tech companies.
The proposed legislation, known as SB 1047, had been passed by the state legislature in late August. It aimed to impose strict rules on the development of powerful AI models, including the implementation of a ‘kill switch’ to prevent potential harm.
Newsom defended his veto in a letter to the state senate, stating that the proposed framework could limit innovation beneficial to the public good. He highlighted that California is home to 32 of the world’s leading AI companies, suggesting that stringent regulations could hinder the state’s technological advancement.
While acknowledging the need for responsible AI development, Newsom expressed concern that the bill’s approach was premature. He argued that a more informed approach, based on empirical data and analysis of AI systems, is necessary for effective regulation.
The veto has been met with mixed reactions. Senator Scott Wiener, the bill’s author, called it a setback for those who support oversight of large corporations making decisions that impact public safety and the environment.
Major AI companies, including Google, OpenAI, and Meta, had voiced their opposition to the bill, arguing that premature regulation could hinder AI development. However, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk publicly endorsed the bill, stating that it was necessary for California’s safety. AI startup Anthropic also supported the bill.
Earlier in September, Newsom had signed three bills aimed at curbing the use of AI in creating misleading images or videos in political advertisements, demonstrating his willingness to regulate AI in specific contexts.
This veto highlights the ongoing debate surrounding AI regulation. While concerns about the potential risks of unchecked AI development are growing, the question remains: how to balance those risks with the potential for innovation and economic growth? The California case is likely to set a precedent for other states and countries considering AI regulation.
