In a bid to secure the crucial Arab American vote in the upcoming US election, Vice President Kamala Harris has made a bold promise: ending the ongoing war in Gaza. During a speech at Michigan State University, Harris laid out her vision for the Middle East, pledging to bring home hostages, ensure Israel’s security, and guarantee Palestinian rights to dignity and self-determination.
Harris’s remarks, delivered just two days before the November 5th election, resonate deeply with Michigan’s Arab American community, a key demographic in the state. “I want to say that this year has been difficult, given the scale of death and destruction in Gaza and the civilian casualties and displacement in Lebanon,” Harris acknowledged, reflecting on the widespread suffering caused by the ongoing conflict.
Her commitment goes further: “As President, I will do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza, to bring home the hostages and the suffering in Gaza, ensure Israel is secure and ensure the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, freedom, security and self-determination.” These words underscore her commitment to a peaceful resolution that prioritizes both Israeli security and Palestinian rights.
The Democratic candidate faces a tight race against Republican challenger Donald Trump, who has also been actively courting Arab American voters. While Trump has voiced support for Israel’s military actions against Hamas and Hezbollah, he has also signaled his willingness to help Israel bring the Gaza war to a close before the end of his potential presidency. This seemingly contradictory stance could complicate Trump’s outreach efforts among Arab Americans, who may perceive his support for Israel’s actions as counterproductive to peace efforts.
Harris’s address in Michigan assumes particular significance given the growing disillusionment among Arab American voters regarding the Biden administration’s handling of the conflict in the Middle East. Michigan, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, has seen some shifts in voting patterns, with a portion of Indian-Americans, Muslims, and African-Americans reportedly leaning towards Trump. This potential shift could impact the outcome of the election, particularly in Michigan, one of the key battleground states.
The heated rhetoric surrounding the Gaza conflict has become a focal point in the US election, highlighting the deep-seated tensions and competing priorities within the American electorate. As the election nears, the candidates’ positions on this complex issue will likely play a crucial role in shaping the outcome and the future of US foreign policy in the Middle East.
