Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Udhayanidhi Stalin, delivered a sharp rebuke to AIADMK leader Edappadi Palaniswami on Sunday, dismissing Palaniswami’s criticism of the DMK government’s naming of various governmental schemes after former Chief Minister Karunanidhi. Speaking at a wedding function in Velankanni, Stalin asserted that Palaniswami’s criticism stems from an inability to accept the resounding success of the DMK’s initiatives and policies.
Stalin directly addressed Palaniswami’s critique, stating that the AIADMK leader’s hopes of witnessing a rift within the DMK’s ruling alliance are unfounded. He confidently declared that the alliance remains robust and unified, ready to face the upcoming elections with unwavering strength and solidarity. “His long wait to see a split in our alliance will never come true. Our strong and firm alliance will continue in the upcoming elections as well,” Stalin emphasized to the assembled guests.
Further bolstering his arguments, Stalin referenced comments made by AIADMK treasurer Dindigul Srinivasan regarding other parties’ demands for significant political concessions in exchange for joining the opposition coalition. “AIADMK treasurer Dindigul Srinivasan says certain parties demanded 20 constituencies and 100 crore to join their coalition. This reflects the dire state the opposition camp is in. The DMK-led alliance is accepted by the people as it is united by principles,” Stalin stated, painting a picture of disarray within the opposition ranks.
He used the occasion to highlight the success of the DMK government’s flagship welfare programs, particularly the Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme. Stalin positioned this scheme, and others like it, as exemplary models of effective welfare implementation, worthy of emulation by other states across India. He framed these successes as a validation of the DMK’s Dravidian model of governance, further underlining the contrast with the opposition’s apparent struggles.
In conclusion, Udhayanidhi Stalin’s statements not only served as a direct counter to Edappadi Palaniswami’s criticisms but also functioned as a broader display of confidence in the DMK’s current political standing and the success of its policies. His remarks highlight the ongoing political tensions and power dynamics within Tamil Nadu’s political landscape as the state gears up for future elections.
