In a landmark ruling, a federal judge in Seattle has upheld an arbitration order compelling Alaska Airlines to reinstate an aircraft maintenance technician who was terminated after testing positive for cannabis in July 2022. The case, which has attracted widespread attention, showcases the growing tension between state and federal laws, particularly in states where marijuana use is legal.
The terminated technician, Gregory Chappell, was dismissed following a random drug test that revealed THC levels exceeding the permissible limit. Chappell argued that his positive result stemmed from inadvertent consumption of an infused edible at a local block party. Despite his explanation, Alaska Airlines, adhering to its zero-tolerance drug policy, declined to investigate his claims and proceeded with the termination.
Chappell’s union, the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA), challenged the dismissal through arbitration and secured his reinstatement in 2023. However, Alaska Airlines contested the arbitration panel’s decision, filing a lawsuit in federal court to overturn the reinstatement, citing safety concerns and questioning the credibility of Chappell’s defense.
However, U.S. District Judge John H. Chun, presiding over the case, affirmed the arbitration board’s decision, stating that the board acted within its jurisdiction. He emphasized that Alaska Airlines failed to provide any evidence suggesting that the board’s remedy was unfair.
In addition to upholding the reinstatement, Judge Chun awarded the union attorneys’ fees and costs. He further remanded the issue of Chappell’s entitlement to back pay and benefits to the arbitration board, acknowledging that the board had not factored in the delay caused by Alaska Airlines’ noncompliance.
The case has sparked heated debate about the evolving legal landscape of cannabis and its implications for the workplace. Attorney Lee Seham, representing AMFA, highlighted the increasing prevalence of marijuana use and the need to protect individuals who may inadvertently consume cannabis in an era of widespread legalization. He asserted that “Marijuana is everywhere. And it can be eaten at a potluck supper, innocently, and without physiological impact, and thereafter destroy a career.”
Dr. Karlene Petitt, a respected aviation safety expert with decades of experience, lauded the ruling, stating, “This is a huge win for airline employees everywhere.” She criticized Alaska Airlines’ handling of the situation and underscored the importance of honoring arbitration decisions.
As cannabis legalization continues to expand across the United States, federally regulated industries such as aviation face the challenge of balancing safety concerns with shifting societal norms. This case serves as a stark reminder of the complex legal and social implications of cannabis legalization and the need for clear guidelines and protections for employees in a changing world.
