The abolition of the two-hour Jumma break in the Assam Assembly has sparked controversy, with AIMIM leader Waris Pathan accusing the BJP government of being anti-Muslim. Pathan, in a video message, condemned the decision, calling it unconstitutional and a violation of the Right to Practice Religion. He highlighted the long-standing tradition of the break, dating back to 1937, questioning the sudden change in policy.
Pathan’s remarks come a day after the Assam Assembly, under the leadership of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, abolished the break for offering Friday Namaz. He accused the BJP government and Sarma of harboring anti-Muslim sentiments, pointing to their previous actions regarding food, clothing, madrassas, and now, prayer.
Pathan further suggested that the BJP’s focus on this issue stems from their failures in areas like development and employment, attempting to polarize the electorate through this move.
Responding to the accusations, Chief Minister Sarma asserted that the decision was made unanimously by all MLAs, including both Hindu and Muslim representatives. He stated that the Assembly’s Malas Rule Committee had resolved to discontinue the break, emphasizing the need to utilize the time for legislative work.
Sarma clarified that while the break has been abolished, individuals remain free to offer their prayers. He added that the practice had been in place since 1937 and was discontinued on Friday.
Meanwhile, Assam Speaker Biswajit Daimary explained the decision, highlighting the challenges faced in holding productive discussions on Fridays due to the limited time available. This move, he suggested, was necessary to ensure efficient legislative functioning.
The abolition of the Jumma break has sparked debate, with some seeing it as an infringement on religious freedom and others viewing it as a necessary measure to enhance legislative productivity. The controversy highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding religious practices and political agendas in the state.
