President Biden this week emphasized his foreign policy experience as a justification for remaining the Democratic nominee in November, but some have criticized that experience and the president’s efforts to portray his achievements as significant. Biden highlighted NATO’s strength and expansion, particularly with the inclusion of Finland and Sweden, as a key accomplishment. He also claimed to have effectively managed the Russia-Ukraine conflict, despite criticism that his approach invited the invasion.
However, the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, where 13 U.S. service members were killed, remains a major point of contention. Biden defended his decision to withdraw, claiming it was necessary to end the U.S. occupation, even though he acknowledged that the withdrawal led to the collapse of the previous Afghan government and the rise of the Taliban.
The Biden administration’s handling of Iran has also been criticized, particularly in light of Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. Critics argue that Biden’s policies, which include relying heavily on sanctions, have appeased Iran and emboldened the country to develop closer ties with Russia and China. While Biden acknowledged this dynamic, he did not offer specific details on how he plans to address it.
The article examines Biden’s claims and the reality of his administration’s handling of various foreign policy issues, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Afghanistan, Iran, and Israel-Gaza relations. It highlights the contrasting perspectives on Biden’s performance, with some praising his leadership while others criticize his approach and question the effectiveness of his policies.
