The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), Mumbai’s civic body, has categorically denied allegations of unfair election practices leveled by Rajesh Gangaram Yerunkar, a Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) candidate from Dahisar, in the recently concluded Maharashtra Assembly elections. Yerunkar, on November 25th, 2024, took to social media to express serious concerns regarding the authenticity and transparency of the election process, particularly the vote counting on November 23rd, 2024.
His allegations centered around several key issues. Firstly, he claimed that the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) received on counting day possessed only one seal, instead of the expected three. He also highlighted discrepancies in the EVM battery charge levels, noting some showed 99% while others displayed significantly lower percentages. Most strikingly, he alleged that despite four eligible voters in his own household, only two votes were recorded for him, questioning the integrity of the process. He questioned, “Are you telling me that my own family members did not vote for me? How is this possible?”
The BMC responded swiftly, issuing a statement on X (formerly Twitter) that forcefully refuted all of Yerunkar’s claims. The statement specifically addressed each allegation point-by-point, emphasizing the accuracy and transparency maintained throughout the election and counting process.
Regarding the discrepancy in EVM seals, the BMC clarified that the carrying cases were indeed properly sealed, and that the vote tallies recorded on Form 17C—a comprehensive record provided to polling agents detailing voter information, vote counts, and EVM identification numbers—perfectly matched the EVM data. They further emphasized that a copy of Form 17C was furnished to all candidates’ representatives on polling day. The BMC also highlighted the absence of any written complaint lodged with the Returning Officer’s office in Dahisar on either polling day or counting day.
The issue of differing EVM battery levels was also addressed. The BMC cited FAQ No. 34 from the Election Commission of India’s website, which explains that the 99% battery display on the control unit (CU) is expected even after prolonged use. This is due to the EVM’s power management system, which gradually depletes battery power even with lighter usage, allowing for a 99% display even if the battery is not at full capacity.
Finally, addressing the claim that Yerunkar received only two votes, the BMC produced evidence demonstrating that he actually received 53 votes, according to Form 17-C Part 2. The statement clearly stated that his family members were indeed registered in the electoral roll (part number 163) and their votes were duly recorded.
In conclusion, the BMC’s statement presents a strong defense against the allegations, providing specific evidence and referencing official documentation and Election Commission guidelines to fully refute Yerunkar’s claims. The statement aims to reassure the public of the integrity of the election process in Dahisar.
