Britain’s plans to send certain asylum seekers to Rwanda have been met with swift condemnation from international organizations. Following Parliament’s approval of legislation permitting deportation flights, both the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the Council of Europe have voiced their concerns.
The UNHCR’s Filippo Grandi expressed his disapproval, stating that the legislation violates the Refugee Convention and damages the UK’s tradition of providing refuge to those in need. The Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner, Michael O’Flaherty, criticized the legislation for restricting asylum seekers’ ability to seek legal intervention upon facing deportation.
Despite the criticism, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak maintains that the deportation flights will deter people from making perilous Channel crossings. His government aims to stem the flow of illegal immigrants, which has become a significant political issue. However, migrant advocates argue that the Rwanda plans breach international law.
The legislation, known as the Safety of Rwanda Bill, was passed in response to a Supreme Court ruling that prevented deportation flights due to concerns over migrant safety in Rwanda. The government has since signed a new treaty with Rwanda, claiming the country is now safe. Rwanda has welcomed the approval, emphasizing its progress in ensuring safety and security since a catastrophic genocide 30 years ago.
The Rwanda deportation plans have also been criticized by the media following reports of several deaths in a migrant boat attempting to cross the English Channel. This incident underscores the dangers faced by migrants, raising concerns about the UK’s immigration policies and international cooperation in addressing global migration challenges.
