Conservative Push to Limit DEI Initiatives Gains Momentum
In a growing trend, conservative forces are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at state and college levels. Approximately one-third of states have taken action to restrict or eliminate these programs.
Legislation Restricting DEI
Republican-led states are passing legislation that prohibits consideration of DEI participation in various aspects of society. Tennessee has banned banks from considering customer involvement in DEI training or social justice programs. Kansas has prohibited the use of diversity, equity, or inclusion statements in decisions related to student admissions, financial aid, and employment at higher education institutions. Iowa’s Republican-led Legislature has approved a budget bill that eliminates all DEI offices and initiatives in higher education unless required by accreditation or federal law.
Conservative Arguments Against DEI
Conservative opponents argue that DEI initiatives prioritize racial or gender identity over individual merit. They claim that these programs promote an agenda that is detrimental to society. Since 2022, conservative and libertarian organizations have provided states with model legislation to eliminate DEI offices or prohibit the use of DEI criteria in decision-making.
Impact on Higher Education
Republican-led Florida and Texas have implemented sweeping bans on DEI efforts in higher education. As a result, universities in these states have eliminated over 100 DEI-related jobs. Other states, such as Alabama, Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Indiana, and Wisconsin, have enacted legislation restricting DEI funding or prohibiting the use of DEI statements in employment and admissions decisions.
Facing Political Pressure
Facing political pressure, some universities have revised their practices regarding DEI. The University of Wisconsin shifted diversity positions to focus on “student success” and eliminated statements supporting diversity on student applications.
Democratic Support for DEI
Despite conservative opposition, Democratic-led states have passed legislation to expand DEI efforts in government and education. Washington requires DEI concepts to be incorporated into state learning standards for public schools. Maryland has created a director of diversity, equity, and inclusion position in its state retirement system. Oregon has allocated funding for a DEI initiative at the Columbia River Gorge Commission.
Conclusion
The conservative movement to limit DEI initiatives is gaining momentum across the US. While some states are enacting restrictive legislation, others continue to support DEI efforts as essential to fostering inclusive and equitable societies.
