In a time when online shopping has become the norm, a housing society in Delhi has taken a rather unusual step to curb the influx of deliveries. The Resident Welfare Association (RWA) issued a circular urging ‘bachelors’ to stop using the security guard to receive their parcels. The notice cited the increasing number of deliveries as a burden on the security guard, who, according to the RWA, is unable to perform his regular duties effectively due to the sheer volume of parcels he has to handle.
This decision has sparked a heated debate online, with many expressing their opinions on the matter. Some users argued that the society’s request is understandable, pointing out that the security guard’s primary responsibility is to ensure the safety of the residents and not to act as a personal delivery person. Others countered that the request is unreasonable and that it is simply not practical for residents to collect their parcels themselves, especially when they are at work.
The debate highlights the growing disconnect between the convenience of online shopping and its potential impact on communities. While e-commerce provides numerous benefits, it also poses challenges for residential areas, particularly in terms of logistics and resource allocation. This incident raises questions about the responsibilities and expectations placed on security guards in housing societies, as well as the balance between individual convenience and the needs of the community.
The online discussion has garnered a lot of attention, with users weighing in on the merits of the society’s decision. Some have suggested that the society could consider implementing a designated parcel area or a system where residents could collect their packages at a specific time. Ultimately, the debate serves as a reminder that the benefits of online shopping come with certain responsibilities, and that finding a balance between individual needs and community interests is crucial for harmonious living.
