A Florida restaurant has found itself at the center of online controversy after implementing a policy that charges customers extra for sharing meals. The restaurant’s strict rules, which have been met with outrage and disbelief from patrons, dictate that every diner must order their own main course, referred to as an entree in the US. Those who choose to share an entree will face a hefty £20 surcharge per person. The restaurant’s guidelines explicitly state: “Every seated guest is expected to order an entree priced item. An upcharge of $27 (£20) per person will be added if an entree is split.”
The restaurant’s rules don’t stop there. Appetizers are deemed to be only for accompanying a main course, and those ordering one as their main meal will be charged an additional £12, although this does include a complimentary house salad and bread service. Furthermore, diners are required to inform staff upfront if they plan to split the bill at the end of the meal. The rules conclude: “If you have concerns about the price of an item, please enquire before ordering. By placing an order, each guest agrees to the terms and conditions of services as stated above.”
The restaurant’s stringent policies have sparked widespread criticism on social media. One user expressed their exasperation with the establishment’s rules, commenting: “If I have to read an essay before ordering food from your restaurant I’m over it.” Another baffled user stated: “So appetizers are an additional 16 dollar fee if you don’t order an entree? That is madness.” Chiming into the conversation, another user said: “Don’t you dare order appetizers without an entree.” A final user summed up the general sentiment with a simple: “Yikes. Pretty hard to enjoy the hospitality when there’s probably a rule for that too.”
The restaurant’s controversial policies have raised questions about the limits of restaurant regulations and the expectations of modern diners. It remains to be seen whether the restaurant will reconsider its rules in the face of such widespread public backlash.
