Former government official Mike Gallagher has joined Palantir Technologies, a data analytics company, sparking a fresh debate on the role of corporate America in national security. Gallagher’s move and his comments have stirred controversy, particularly as he claims the “true divide” in national security isn’t between political parties, but between the values of everyday Americans and the interests of corporations. This assertion comes at a time of increasing global tensions, with potential conflicts brewing in the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific region.
During an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Gallagher asserted that “corporate America simply was unwilling to defend American values from Chinese Communist Party aggressions and transnational aggression.” He emphasizes that this reluctance poses a significant risk to the nation’s security, implying a disturbing disconnect between corporate priorities and the nation’s best interests.
Gallagher’s move to Palantir, a company known for its work in defense and intelligence, appears to be a continuation of his dedication to national security, now from within the private sector. He praises Palantir’s role in modernizing defense strategies and revitalizing American manufacturing, particularly in his home state of Wisconsin. However, he also criticizes corporate America’s unwillingness to confront threats like the Chinese Communist Party, highlighting a growing concern about corporate interests potentially undermining national security.
His criticism extends to Wall Street’s investment strategies towards China, which he previously attempted to reform. Gallagher led a bipartisan group of lawmakers in introducing legislation aimed at forcing ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, to sell the platform or face a ban in the United States. His vocal stance against China’s influence and his move to Palantir reflect his commitment to safeguarding American interests and values.
Gallagher’s comments raise critical questions about the balance between corporate profits and national security. He argues that success in the private sector doesn’t have to come at the expense of core American values, challenging the conventional wisdom about national security threats. His move to Palantir and his outspoken criticisms mark a turning point in the debate about corporate America’s role in national security and the need for a stronger commitment to defending Western values in the face of global challenges.
