The 2024 presidential election has brought renewed attention to the issue of fracking, particularly in light of Vice President Kamala Harris’s evolving stance on the controversial practice. While Harris previously expressed support for banning fracking during her 2020 presidential campaign, her stance has since shifted, leading to skepticism and calls for a clear energy policy plan from industry leaders.
Jeff Eshelman, President and CEO of the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), expressed concern over Harris’s apparent change of heart, emphasizing the significance of fracking to communities and consumers nationwide. He argued that her shift, which he interpreted as a recognition of fracking’s political appeal, necessitates a comprehensive energy plan to address the industry’s concerns.
The American Petroleum Institute (API) echoed these concerns, questioning Harris’s commitment to a pro-fracking approach. Amanda Eversole, Executive Vice President of API, suggested that Harris’s recent statements on fracking are motivated by the crucial role of Pennsylvania in the presidential race, given the state’s substantial oil and gas sector. She stressed the importance of a clear explanation of Harris’s energy policy beyond mere support for fracking, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability to voters.
In response to the criticism, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign asserted that the vice president has been consistent in her support for clean energy and a secure energy future for all Americans. They highlighted the Biden-Harris administration’s record on energy production and job creation, emphasizing their commitment to a sustainable and affordable energy future.
The debate over fracking remains a key issue in the 2024 election, particularly in swing states like Pennsylvania. The oil and gas industry is closely watching Harris’s pronouncements on fracking, demanding clear answers on her energy policy plans and her vision for the future of the industry.
