Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s ambition to create an ‘alternative royal family’ image has taken a hit following their recent visit to Columbia. The couple’s trip, which aimed to raise awareness about important issues, has sparked significant backlash, leaving them facing criticism and questioning their approach.
The controversy stems from the perception that Harry and Meghan attempted to conduct an official royal tour, despite stepping down from their royal duties. Their actions have been seen as an attempt to outshine Harry’s family and even overshadow the work of other royals. Critics have pointed out the hypocrisy of their actions, questioning why they would conduct such a tour while simultaneously distancing themselves from the monarchy.
One of the main points of contention is the hefty security costs associated with the visit, estimated at £1.5 million. Many have expressed concern that the couple’s trip placed a significant financial burden on the impoverished country. Adding fuel to the fire, Columbian official Andres Escobar has stated that the couple was invited by Vice President Francia Marquez “because she saw them on Netflix.” He emphasizes the unfairness of the situation, suggesting that the Columbian people are shouldering the costs for a visit inspired by a Netflix appearance.
Sources close to the couple have revealed their desire to be seen as equals to Prince William and Kate Middleton, but without the constraints of royal protocol. They are eager to continue these types of tours, which they view as both fulfilling and beneficial for their brand. However, the recent backlash, coupled with similar criticisms during their visit to Nigeria, has left them feeling embarrassed. They are aware of their global platform and its potential to raise awareness, but the balancing act between their desire to be seen as influential figures and the need to win over public opinion remains a challenge.
