Republican vice-presidential candidate JD Vance has come to the defense of Tucker Carlson, who has faced criticism for hosting a Holocaust revisionist on his podcast. The controversy erupted after Carlson interviewed Darryl Cooper, a known Holocaust denier, on his show. While Carlson lauded Cooper as possibly “the best and most honest popular historian” in the country, Vance, despite distancing himself from Cooper’s views, declined to criticize Carlson directly.
In a statement to the Jewish Insider, a representative from Vance’s campaign stated that the candidate “doesn’t believe in guilt-by-association cancel culture” but “obviously does not share the views of the guest interviewed by Tucker Carlson.” Vance himself further defended Carlson by emphasizing the importance of free speech and arguing against censorship. “We believe in free speech and debate,” he said. “This whole idea that has taken hold in the far left of this country, that if you see a bad idea, the way to solve it is to censor it, I think it’s ridiculous.”
This stance has drawn mixed reactions. Some have praised Vance for his commitment to free expression, even when faced with controversial viewpoints. However, others have criticized his decision to defend Carlson, arguing that public figures should be held accountable for the views they platform.
This incident highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the limits of free speech and the responsibility of public figures in promoting potentially harmful ideas. While Vance’s defense of Carlson may resonate with those who value absolute free speech, it could also alienate others who believe that public figures should be held accountable for the views they promote.
The controversy also carries potential political implications, as Vance’s stance could impact his standing among voters, particularly those within the Jewish community. Despite the ongoing debate, Vance is scheduled to appear with Carlson at an event in Hershey, Pennsylvania, later this month.
