A recent case in Karnataka has cast a shadow over the state’s education system, raising concerns about the validity of examinations and the potential for manipulation. Prabhu Laxmikanth Lokare, a 23-year-old peon at a local court, secured a remarkable 99.7% in his Class 10 board exams. However, a shocking revelation – Lokare allegedly cannot read or write – has triggered an investigation into his academic credentials.
Lokare’s impressive score in the Class 10 exams played a crucial role in securing his peon position at the Koppal district court. He reportedly cleared the recruitment exam based solely on his high marks on April 22nd, 2024. However, red flags emerged when a judge at the court noticed Lokare’s apparent difficulties with reading and writing. This discrepancy prompted the judge to file a private complaint with the police, sparking an investigation into Lokare’s academic history.
According to an FIR filed in the case, Lokare allegedly took the Class 10 board exams directly after completing Class 7. The FIR further states that he secured an improbable score of 623 out of a possible 625 marks. Despite this seemingly exceptional performance, Lokare reportedly lacks basic literacy skills in Kannada, English, and Hindi. This stark contrast raises serious doubts about the legitimacy of his academic achievement.
In his defense, Lokare claims to have appeared as a private candidate in the Class 10 exams conducted by the Delhi Education Board during the 2017-18 academic year. He asserts that the exam was held at an institution located in Karnataka’s Bagalakote district. However, these claims remain unverified and require thorough investigation.
The judge has rightly demanded a comprehensive probe into the matter. This investigation should not only examine Lokare’s specific case but also explore the possibility of similar fraudulent practices. Additionally, the judge has called for a comparison between Lokare’s handwriting and the answers on his Class 10 exam sheets. These steps are crucial for ensuring transparency and upholding the integrity of the education system.
The judge’s concerns are well-founded. Such instances of potentially fabricated academic records pose a significant threat to a fair and meritocratic system. It disadvantages deserving candidates who diligently strive for academic success. A thorough investigation and appropriate corrective measures are essential to restore trust in the system and ensure that opportunities are awarded based on genuine merit.
