Manipur Government Recants Claim of 900 Kuki Militants Entering State

The Manipur government has backtracked on its claim that 900 Kuki militants crossed into the state from war-torn Myanmar. Last week, the state’s security advisor, Kuldiep Singh, stated that intelligence agencies reported the militants’ potential entry and plans to attack villages around September 28. However, in a joint statement with Director General of Police (DGP) Rajiv Singh, the advisor clarified that while the information was initially verified, it could not be substantiated on the ground. They emphasized that there is currently no reason to believe the claim and that security forces remain on high alert to protect citizens and their property.

The government’s retraction came after concerns were raised by both politicians and communities. Manipur Congress MLA Th Lokeshwar expressed worry over Singh’s initial statement, highlighting its potential to cause panic among residents of Imphal Valley’s outlying villages. Lokeshwar demanded clarification on the basis of the assertion and measures taken to counter the alleged militants’ entry. He emphasized the need to alleviate the fear instilled in villagers.

The Manipur Tribals’ Forum Delhi, representing the Kuki-Zomi-Hmar communities, also voiced its condemnation of the Manipur government’s actions, accusing them of spreading misinformation about their communities. The forum urged the central government to intervene and address what they perceive as biased and unjust treatment towards them.

The initial claim about the militants’ entry followed a series of protests by Meitei communities in Imphal. These protests demanded security force action against Kuki insurgents blamed for recent attacks. This event highlights the long-standing tensions between the Meitei and Kuki communities, fueled by competition for land and public jobs. The government’s initial statement and its subsequent retraction showcase the complex dynamics at play in Manipur, raising questions about the reliability of information disseminated by authorities and the potential for fueling further tensions and anxieties within the state.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top