Prince Harry’s eviction from Frogmore Cottage has sparked controversy, with experts suggesting it was perceived as a ‘cruel rejection’ by the Duke of Sussex. Royal commentator Tom Quinn criticized Harry’s reaction, labeling it as ‘spoiled’ and suggesting he viewed himself as an ‘eternal victim.’
Quinn stated that Harry was ‘absolutely furious and in tears’ about the eviction, believing it was ‘purely vindictive.’ He claimed that Harry ‘couldn’t see that choosing to stop being a working royal would inevitably mean being deprived of his royal residence.’
Quinn further suggested that Harry viewed the eviction as a reminder of his parents’ divorce, feeling that Charles had ‘no right’ to do it. He added that Harry believes he should always get whatever he wants, regardless of the consequences.
However, Quinn also criticized Harry’s behavior, stating that ‘many see him as just a poor little rich kid behaving like a spoiled brat.’ He contrasted this with Harry’s self-perception as an ‘eternal victim.’