People seeking immunity from bird flu by consuming raw milk face serious health risks, experts warn. Despite news of the H5N1 virus infecting cows and increased raw milk sales, health officials emphasize the low risk of transmission to humans, as bird flu viruses rarely jump to people. However, the deliberate consumption of raw milk, hoping to gain immunity, is strongly discouraged due to potential health hazards and the lack of scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness.
The H5N1 virus, a highly pathogenic avian influenza, primarily affects birds and can be carried by wild birds. The recent outbreak among mammals, including skunks, raccoons, and foxes, and its spread to dairy cows, has raised concerns. However, there have been no reported cases of human-to-human transmission of the H5N1 virus.
Experts emphasize the importance of pasteurization in limiting exposure to pathogens in milk. Raw milk consumption has been linked to various illnesses, and its safety remains questionable. The FDA recommends against consuming unpasteurized milk and dairy products due to limited information on the potential for infection.
Despite these cautions, proponents of raw milk continue to promote its use, dismissing health concerns as fearmongering. However, the potential risks associated with raw milk consumption, both in general and in the context of bird flu, cannot be ignored.
Ongoing research is crucial to fully understand the transmission of the virus from birds to cows and to assess the potential for human infection through dairy products. Until more information is available, health officials urge the public to refrain from consuming raw milk and to practice good hygiene measures to minimize the risk of exposure to bird flu.
