The latest development in Scott Peterson’s ongoing fight for a new trial, two decades after his conviction for murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son, has taken a significant turn. The LA Innocence Project, representing Peterson, has requested new DNA testing. However, the original prosecutors from Stanislaus County, who secured Peterson’s murder conviction in 2004, have filed a motion vehemently opposing the retesting.
In their 337-page court filing, the prosecutors argue that there is no need for additional DNA analysis. They contend that the overwhelming evidence presented during the trial, along with Peterson’s repeated lies about his involvement in Laci’s death, makes further DNA testing redundant. They emphasize that Peterson’s actions, such as purchasing a boat and contemplating murder after a friend exposed his affair, coupled with the discovery of pliers on the boat containing a hair consistent with Laci’s, decisively implicate him as the perpetrator.
The prosecution also highlights Peterson’s evasive behavior before his arrest, including changing his appearance and possessing multiple identification documents, cash, and cell phones. They argue that these actions demonstrate his guilt and render DNA testing irrelevant.
Additionally, the prosecutors assert that Laci’s family has endured immense suffering and deserve closure. They view Peterson’s renewed attempts for a new trial as harassment.
Legal analyst Steven Clark acknowledges the significance of the court’s decision to hold hearings on the DNA testing issue. He observes that the involvement of the Innocence Project suggests a genuine possibility that the jury’s verdict could be re-examined. However, he remains cautious, emphasizing that the strength of the prosecution’s evidence in the original trial may ultimately sway the court’s decision.
The hearing on the DNA issue is scheduled for the end of May, marking a crucial juncture in Peterson’s efforts to secure a new trial.
