The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could have a major impact on how cities address homelessness. The case, brought by the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, asks whether it is constitutional for cities to punish homeless people for camping in public spaces.
Advocates for the homeless argue that criminalizing homelessness makes it harder for people to find housing. They say that fining or jailing homeless people simply pushes them further into poverty and makes it harder for them to access the services they need.
City officials, on the other hand, say that they need to be able to enforce laws against camping in public spaces in order to protect public safety and health. They argue that encampments can attract crime and blight, and that they can be a nuisance for residents and businesses.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case later this year. The decision could have a significant impact on how cities across the country address homelessness.
