Closing Arguments and Jury Instructions in Trump Hush Money Trial Draw Mixed Reactions

Inside the media room during the closing arguments in the Trump hush money trial, reporters were reportedly amused by the prosecutor’s jabs at Donald Trump. While Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche spoke in a monotone, the prosecution’s Josh Steinglass gave a passionate but lengthy summation that tested the jurors’ attention spans. Judge Juan Merchan’s confusing jury instructions further added to the complexity of the trial, leaving the media with the task of filling airtime while waiting for the verdict.

Closing Arguments Expected in Trump Criminal Trial, Judge Bars Former President from Speaking

Closing arguments are set for Tuesday in the criminal trial of former President Trump, where Manhattan prosecutors will present their case against him for allegedly falsifying business records to conceal a payment made to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign. Judge Juan Merchan has denied Trump’s request to speak during the closing arguments. The jury will deliberate on a verdict after hearing summations from both sides.

Closing Arguments in Trump Hush Money Trial: What to Expect

Closing arguments are scheduled in Trump’s hush money trial in New York, the only case against the former president likely to reach a jury before the November election. Prosecutors will aim to prove Trump falsified business records to conceal an alleged encounter with Stormy Daniels, while the defense needs to create reasonable doubt among jurors to secure an acquittal. After closing arguments, the jury will deliberate, with the verdict read in court once reached. If convicted, Trump would likely be released on bond as he awaits sentencing, which could include a maximum of four years in prison, though sentences for first-time offenders with no criminal history are typically less than a year.

Scroll to Top