Trump Defense Strategy: ‘Throw Everything Against the Wall’ to Appeal to Lone Holdout

In the ongoing trial against former President Donald Trump, the defense team has adopted a strategy of presenting a wide range of arguments in hopes of appealing to at least one holdout juror. This approach, known as jury nullification, aims to sway a single juror to resist conviction regardless of the evidence presented. While the concept of a hung jury due to jury nullification is often discussed, its actual prevalence is difficult to quantify. Despite the defense’s attempts to humanize Trump and cherry-pick witnesses to attack, the prosecution’s case remains strong. A hung jury would result in a mistrial, but the prosecution could choose to retry the case, making any potential victory for Trump short-lived.

Trump Claims Supporter Presence Prevented by Security at Manhattan Trial

Former US President Donald Trump has asserted that security measures have hindered thousands of his supporters from attending his hush money trial in Manhattan. However, observers have noted only a small number of Trump supporters present, and the courthouse remains open to the public. Despite tight security due to the high-profile nature of the trial, individuals can assemble across the street in a park. Trump has previously exaggerated crowd sizes and may be attempting to counter reports expressing his disappointment with the level of support during the trial, which involves unprecedented criminal charges related to hush money payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump’s Social Media Posts Violate Gag Order, Judge Hears

Former President Donald Trump’s social media posts may land him in trouble, as prosecutors argue he violated a gag order barring him from criticizing witnesses in his ongoing criminal trial in New York. Georgetown Law professor David Super believes the posts clearly violate the order and expects the judge to fine Trump rather than imprison him. Despite the potential consequences, Trump has criticized the gag order as unconstitutional and vowed to continue defending himself. The trial continues with testimony, including former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker’s account of Trump’s involvement in burying negative stories during the 2016 election.

Fox News Sidesteps Trump Trial, Focuses on Grievances

As Donald Trump’s first criminal trial unfolds, Fox News has maintained an unusual stance, largely neglecting the proceedings in favor of highlighting Trump’s complaints about the case. The Daily Beast’s Justin Baragona observes that Fox has dedicated minimal coverage to the trial, instead emphasizing Trump’s alleged mistreatment and criticizing the court’s handling of the situation.

Biden Campaigns as Trump Faces Criminal Trial in Unprecedented 2024 Election Cycle

As the 2024 presidential election cycle gains momentum, President Joe Biden embarked on campaign events while former President Donald Trump attended jury selection in his criminal trial. Biden’s focus on pocketbook issues and abortion access aims to sway voters against Trump, who emphasizes border security and energy drilling. Recent polls suggest a close race, with both candidates facing challenges and opportunities that will shape the upcoming campaign.

Trump’s Defense May Be Hampered by Lead Attorney’s Courtroom Demeanor

Two prospective jurors who were dismissed from the criminal trial of Donald Trump have expressed concerns about the demeanor of the former president’s lead attorney, Todd Blanche. They described Blanche as being “folksy” and “disingenuous,” and accused him of attempting to “root out” potential jurors who might be sympathetic to Democrats. One of the prospective jurors, a man, said he was frustrated by Blanche’s questioning about his past social media posts, which he felt implied that he could not be fair and impartial. Both prospective jurors said they had hoped to serve on the jury and believed they could have been fair, but they were ultimately excused based on Blanche’s concerns.

Trump Trial: Jury Lawyers Could Aid in Explaining NDAs

Two lawyers serving on the jury in the Stormy Daniels hush money trial may play a crucial role in clarifying the defense’s argument regarding non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). Trump’s legal team contends that the NDA signed by Daniels is legal, weakening the prosecution’s case against him. Law professor Stephen Gillers believes that the presence of these lawyers on the jury will assist other jurors in understanding the legality of NDAs.

Donald Trump Faces Historic Criminal Trial, Secret Service Prepares for Potential Prison Protection

Former President Donald Trump is facing a historic criminal trial in Manhattan, marking the first time a former U.S. president has faced criminal prosecution. The trial involves 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal. Behind the scenes, the U.S. Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies are grappling with the unprecedented scenario of potentially having to protect Trump in prison if he is convicted. Trump’s lawyers defended him at a hearing on Tuesday, claiming that he merely reposted what other people said. However, the judge pointed out that Trump had embellished the comments of others. Trump faces up to $1,000 per violation or up to 30 days in jail for violating a gag order placed on him in the hush money case. Prosecutors also revealed that Trump’s discussions with Steve Bannon are relevant to the “primary” underlying crime that elevates the charges Trump faces from a misdemeanor to a felony.

Trump Faces Fines for Violating Gag Order in Criminal Trial

Former President Donald Trump could face fines for violating a gag order imposed on him in his ongoing criminal trial. The order, issued by Judge Juan Merchan in March, prohibits Trump from making public statements about potential witnesses, jurors, and others involved in the case. Prosecutors allege that Trump has violated the order 10 times through public statements and social media posts, including reposting comments about potential witnesses and jurors. Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, argued that his client did not violate the order and was defending himself against political attacks. However, Judge Merchan expressed skepticism of Blanche’s arguments and suggested he was disinclined to side with him. Trump has previously shown little regard for the gag order and has continued to speak out against potential witnesses in the case. Officials have reportedly discussed the logistics of potentially incarcerating Trump for violating the order, including providing him with separate accommodations and Secret Service protection.

Scroll to Top