Results for: Federal Trade Commission

In her book “The Everything War,” Dana Mattioli chronicles Amazon’s relentless pursuit of market dominance, alleging misuse of power and unethical behavior. She highlights the case of Diapers.com, which was forced to sell itself to Amazon after the e-commerce giant aggressively slashed prices. The book culmiates with the Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit against Amazon, accusing it of operating an illegal monopoly. However, Mattioli’s account is criticized for lacking a “gotcha” moment and relying on hyperbolic language. Despite its flaws, the book raises important questions about antitrust laws and the need to reign in the power of corporate giants like Amazon.

The Biden administration has rolled out over a dozen new initiatives and rules in a frantic attempt to boost its chances in the upcoming midterm elections. According to a new CNN poll, Trump is leading the president by six points, one of the biggest gaps yet. The survey also shows Trump inching ahead in several critical swing states.

The Biden administration’s flurry of activity includes new FTC rules that ban non-compete agreements, a re-write of Title IX, EEOC charges of racism against a company for avoiding hiring criminals, and more federal help on student loans.

Critics say the White House is panicked and that its policies are not well-thought-out. The Trump administration employed a similar strategy in its final months, ditching several policies rolled out late in President Obama’s second term. Biden returned the favor when he came to office.

Recent actions by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Biden administration have brought significant changes for American workers. The FTC’s ban on noncompete agreements could allow millions of employees to pursue opportunities outside of their current employers. Additionally, the new overtime rule will make many salaried workers eligible for overtime pay, potentially benefiting millions more. While these new rules aim to enhance worker mobility and financial well-being, they face potential legal challenges and will require employers to adapt their practices.

Business groups, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have sued the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over its decision to ban noncompete agreements, arguing that the agency overstepped its authority and that noncompete agreements are necessary to protect intellectual property. The FTC voted to pass the rule blocking new noncompete agreements and requiring employers to revoke existing ones, with an exemption for senior executives. The agency estimates that the ban will allow 30 million people, or 18% of the U.S. workforce, to change jobs within their industry and earn more money. The lawsuit was filed by the Chamber, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The new rule was expected to go into effect in 120 days, but the legal challenges will likely delay its implementation.

A study has found that hundreds of hospital mergers have escaped federal antitrust scrutiny over the past two decades, leading to higher prices and less competition in the healthcare sector. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), tasked with enforcing antitrust laws, lacks sufficient resources and manpower to effectively monitor all anticompetitive hospital deals. Additionally, certain state laws shield hospital mergers from federal review, further limiting the FTC’s ability to intervene.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has unanimously voted to ban noncompete agreements nationwide. These agreements prohibit employees from working for competing companies within the same industry after leaving their current job. The FTC estimates that approximately 30 million Americans are currently subject to noncompetes, which can limit career opportunities, suppress wages, and hinder economic growth. The ban, which will take effect 120 days after its publication in the Federal Register, will apply to both new and existing noncompetes, excluding those for senior executives with high salaries and policy-making roles. Business groups have pledged to challenge the rule, but the FTC maintains that it will promote worker mobility, foster innovation, and increase economic dynamism.

The US companies will no longer be able to bar employees from taking jobs with competitors under a new rule approved by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The move is sure to be met with legal challenges, but the FTC argues that the ban is necessary to protect workers and promote competition. Noncompete agreements, which prevent workers from jumping to or starting competing companies for a prescribed period, currently affect about 30 million people in the US. The Biden administration has been targeting noncompete measures, which have become increasingly common in recent years, even among lower-paid workers. The FTC maintains that these agreements harm workers by reducing their ability to switch jobs for higher pay and disadvantage workers not covered by them as fewer jobs become available. The rule, which will take effect in six months, has been met with criticism from business groups, who argue that the FTC lacks the authority to take such a broad step.