Biden Administration Aims to Ban Noncompete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has approved a rule that would prohibit U.S. companies from enforcing noncompete agreements. These agreements restrict employees from working for competitors for a specified period after leaving their current job. The FTC estimates that approximately 30 million American workers are currently subject to such agreements. The Biden administration has argued that noncompete agreements harm workers by limiting their job mobility and suppressing wages. Business groups have criticized the rule as overreaching and lacking legal authority. A lawsuit by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is expected to delay the implementation of the rule, and its future could be uncertain depending on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election.

FTC Blocks $8.5 Billion Tapestry-Capri Merger, Citing Antitrust Concerns

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit to block the proposed $8.5 billion merger between Tapestry, Inc. and Capri Holdings Limited, citing antitrust concerns. Tapestry owns brands such as Coach and Kate Spade, while Capri owns brands like Michael Kors and Versace. The FTC alleges that the deal would eliminate direct competition between the two companies in the ‘accessible luxury’ handbag market, giving Tapestry an unfair advantage. The regulators also expressed concerns about potential negative consequences for workers in the combined company, including lower wages and reduced workplace benefits.

US Agency Expected to Ban Worker ‘Noncompete’ Agreements

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is expected to ban agreements commonly signed by workers not to join their employers’ competitors. The rule aims to increase worker mobility and suppress their pay, according to the FTC. The proposal has faced criticism from business groups who argue that noncompetes protect trade secrets and promote competitiveness. The rule, if approved, would require companies to scrap existing noncompete agreements and inform employees that they will not be enforced. The FTC estimates the rule could increase workers’ earnings by nearly $300 billion per year and improve job opportunities for 30 million Americans.

Final Vote Looms: FTC Set to Decide Fate of Noncompete Clauses

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is poised to issue a final ruling on the legality of noncompete agreements. The proposed rule seeks to ban most employers from using such clauses, which the FTC argues harm workers and stifle economic growth. The vote comes after months of public feedback and legal scrutiny, with businesses opposing the ban and workers expressing support. The outcome of the vote will have significant implications for the American workforce and businesses alike.

FTC Challenges Tapestry’s Acquisition of Capri, Citing Reduced Competition and Employee Benefits Concerns

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expressed concerns over Tapestry’s proposed $8.5 billion acquisition of Capri, citing potential harm to consumers and employees. According to the FTC, the merger would eliminate competition between six brands: Tapestry’s Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman, and Capri’s Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo, and Versace. The FTC alleges that the deal would result in higher prices, fewer choices, and reduced employee benefits. Tapestry has defended the acquisition, arguing that it operates in a competitive market and that the merger would not harm consumers or employees.

FTC Blocks $8.5 Billion Coach-Capri Acquisition

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit to block the $8.5 billion acquisition of Capri Holdings by Coach and Kate Spade’s parent company, Tapestry. The deal would have combined six fashion brands under one company, including Tapestry’s Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman, and Capri’s Versace, Jimmy Choo, and Michael Kors. However, the FTC argues that the merger would harm shoppers and employees by reducing competition and raising prices.

Scroll to Top