President Trump’s re-election victory has sparked discussions about the pending New York criminal case against him. As he faces a possible sentence, legal experts are questioning the timing and implications of the case, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity. This article analyzes the legal arguments and explores the potential outcomes, including the possibility of a pardon.
Results for: Lawfare
Venture capitalist Naval Ravikant, known for his involvement in AngelList, has launched a scathing critique of the legal actions against Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, accusing both sides of engaging in ‘selective prosecution’ that threatens to undermine American democracy. He argues that the Democratic Party’s pursuit of legal action against Trump is a dangerous precedent, potentially turning the nation into a ‘one-party state better known as a dictatorship.’ He further criticizes Harris’s record as San Francisco’s D.A., citing the city’s current state as evidence of her ineffective policies. Ravikant also explores the dynamics of single-issue voters and the dangers of restricting free speech, highlighting the dangers of those who seek to control others.
Former President Donald Trump has condemned the ongoing NY v. Trump trial as a sham, accusing prosecutors of proving his point that the legal system is biased against him. Trump cited comments from legal experts and Fox News contributors, arguing that the prosecution has failed to prove any crime.