India’s Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, expressed strong displeasure on Tuesday over a new practice of lawyers repeatedly mentioning the same case for listing, aiming to secure a favorable hearing date. He declared that he would not tolerate such tactics, as it jeopardizes his personal credibility and undermines the court’s integrity.
Justice Manmohan, a seasoned legal professional, was sworn in as the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on September 29th. His journey from a young advocate to the head of the Delhi High Court is marked by notable achievements and contributions to the legal field.
Former President Donald Trump’s attorney, Will Scharf, has alleged political weaponization of the legal system in the hush-money case against his client. Scharf cited the involvement of Matthew Colangelo, a former Biden administration official, as assistant district attorney in the prosecution. He also raised concerns about Judge Juan M. Merchan’s refusal to recuse himself despite alleged conflicts of interest. Trump’s legal team intends to challenge the conviction on appeal, arguing due process violations and biased jury instructions. Scharf emphasized Trump’s right to comment on matters of public importance, including the alleged politicization of prosecution.
This article aims to counter accusations that individuals associated with India’s ruling party are immune to legal scrutiny and that investigative agencies are politically biased. It highlights the robustness of India’s legal framework and provides factual evidence regarding the operations of the CBI and ED, emphasizing their impartiality and dedication to upholding the law. The author argues that these agencies operate within the constraints of international cooperation and the technical nature of evidence, and that their investigations are not influenced by political motivations. The article stresses the importance of respecting the judiciary and upholding India’s sovereignty, and concludes by emphasizing that people’s political affiliations are not solely influenced by criminal cases but by ideological alignments and other factors.
