Arizona Court Orders Release of Voter Rolls Data to Conservative Watchdog Group

A Maricopa County court ruled that the county must provide America First Legal (AFL) with a list of noncitizens registered to vote. This decision comes after AFL filed a lawsuit in August, arguing that Arizona’s public records law requires the release of this information. The court rejected arguments from the Arizona Secretary of State and a political science professor who claimed releasing the list could lead to violence.

Arizona Election Worker Charged With Theft Had Ties to Democratic Politicians

Walter Ringfield Jr., a temporary election worker in Arizona, was arrested for stealing a security fob from the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center. Ringfield also faces charges related to a theft from the Arizona State Senate Building. He has been seen in photos with several prominent Democratic politicians, raising questions about his motivations and the security of election systems.

Arizona Election Worker Arrested for Allegedly Stealing Security Device, Raising Concerns About Vetting

A temporary election worker in Maricopa County, Arizona, was arrested for allegedly stealing a security key from a ballot tabulation center. This incident has raised concerns about the vetting process for election staff, as the suspect was previously arrested for theft from a grocery store and was in a felony diversion program. Authorities are investigating whether the theft was politically motivated.

Prison Whistleblower Found Not Guilty in Alleged Assault Case

A Maricopa County Superior Court judge has acquitted former prison Lieutenant Mark Hasz in an aggravated assault case, marking the second time the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office has failed to secure a conviction against him. Hasz, who had previously spoken out about concerns within the prison system, was fired and charged with aggravated assault following a use-of-force incident in July 2020. His defense team was reportedly barred from presenting evidence of his whistleblowing activities during the first trial, but the judge made no such ruling in this second trial.

Scroll to Top