Newsom Signs Bill to Protect Arizona Abortionists from Penalties

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 233, allowing abortionists from Arizona to perform abortions on Arizonian women in California and shielding them from penalties in their home state. This move comes after the Arizona Supreme Court reinstated a pre-statehood law banning abortions in nearly all circumstances. Newsom condemned the Arizona Republicans’ attempts to restrict abortion access and expressed California’s commitment to reproductive freedom.

Mother and Mother Tongue Join Forces for a Night of Fashion and Advocacy

On the eve of Mother’s Day, Los Angeles-based denim label Mother and female-founded media brand Mother Tongue came together to celebrate their collaboration and advocate for important issues affecting women. The star-studded event, held at the Mars speakeasy in Hollywood, featured guests such as Rumer Willis, Hilary Rhoda, and Gillian Jacobs, who showed their support by pinning campaign statements to their Mother Spring collection ensembles. Co-founders of Mother and Mother Tongue emphasized the urgency of reproductive rights and gun control in this election year, and announced a $10,000 donation to Planned Parenthood Federation of America and Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. The evening culminated in a performance by Rainey Qualley and the gifting of campaign-themed accessories to attendees, ensuring that the message of empowerment and advocacy would continue to spread with fashionable flair.

The Unseen Harm: Mental Health Consequences of Abortion Restrictions

Access to abortion is essential for women’s mental health. Abortion restrictions have been linked to increased anxiety, depression, and suicide risk. Yet, states with restrictive abortion laws often lack adequate maternal mental health resources. The intersection of abortion denial and stigma creates shame and trauma, further exacerbating mental health challenges. Advocacy efforts to protect abortion rights are crucial to safeguarding the mental well-being of women and families.

Idaho Abortion Restrictions Clash with Federal Law in Supreme Court Case

The Supreme Court is considering an Idaho law that criminalizes abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or when the patient’s life is in danger. The Biden administration argues that this law violates the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires emergency rooms to treat patients with urgent medical conditions, including pregnant women who need abortions. The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether to uphold the Idaho law or the federal law, which could have far-reaching implications for abortion access in the United States.

Harry Dunn: From Capitol Police Officer to Congressional Candidate

Harry Dunn, a former Capitol Police officer who testified about the January 6th insurrection, is running for Congress. He has raised a significant amount of money and has received endorsements from prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff. However, he faces criticism from some old colleagues who have accused him of being a self-serving show horse. Dunn’s campaign is focused on protecting democracy and reproductive rights.

Arizona House Approves Repeal of Near-Total Abortion Ban

The Arizona House of Representatives has voted to repeal a near-total ban on abortions, clearing an initial hurdle in a battleground state where the issue has become a political flashpoint. The measure, which passed with the support of three Republicans, faces additional hurdles before it can become law, but its approval signals a shift in the state’s political landscape.

Tennessee Set to Outlaw Assistance to Minors Seeking Abortion Without Parental Consent

Tennessee is poised to follow Idaho in banning adults from aiding minors in obtaining abortions without parental permission. Despite anticipated legal challenges, the measure is expected to be signed into law, potentially affecting access to healthcare for vulnerable minors. Opponents, including Democratic Rep. Aftyn Behn, have criticized the bill as an infringement on parental rights. Meanwhile, supporters argue that it protects minors and alleviates the burden on parents.

Scroll to Top