AI in Social Media Advertising: Privacy Concerns, Ethical Implications, and the Future

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in social media has sparked significant debate, particularly regarding user privacy and ethical concerns. Social media platforms like Facebook (now Meta) leverage AI to analyze vast amounts of user data, including likes, shares, and content interactions, to create detailed user profiles and target advertising campaigns. However, allegations of platforms listening to private conversations for ad targeting have been repeatedly denied. Instead, AI algorithms parse user activity on the platform to identify interests and preferences. The extent of data collection and analysis raises concerns about intrusion and the fine line between personalized advertising and privacy invasion. Critics argue for greater transparency, user control over data, and the need for ethical practices that respect user privacy and data security. By understanding user preferences and behaviors, AI enhances user experience and curates content that aligns with individual interests. However, the future of AI in social media advertising depends on balancing its innovative potential with ethical considerations, regulatory compliance, and the involvement of users in shaping a more responsible approach to data usage.

Political Parties Flout Poll Code with Social Media Ads During Silence Period

Major political parties in India, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress, have been found to have violated the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) during the 48-hour silence period preceding the first phase of the country’s general elections. Despite clear rules prohibiting political campaigning during this time, the parties spent substantial money on advertising campaigns on social media platforms like Google and Meta. The BJP was particularly active, posting over 60,000 ads on Google and 6,808 on Meta during the period from April 17 to 19, 2024. The Congress, in contrast, posted 1,882 and 114 ads on the same platforms, respectively. Notably, the BJP targeted its digital campaigns with precision, focusing on specific localities and constituencies that voted in the first phase of elections. In contrast, the Congress avoided constituency-level targeting, excluding several poll-bound constituencies from its ad campaigns. The findings raise concerns about the effectiveness of the MCC in ensuring free and fair elections in India.

Scroll to Top