Twenty-four state attorneys general are petitioning the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court ruling and uphold Arizona’s law prohibiting biological boys from competing in girls’ sports, arguing it’s crucial for fair competition and protecting female athletes.
The Supreme Court criticized the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) for its delay in implementing Stage 3 of the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) to combat Delhi’s worsening air pollution. The court has ordered stricter enforcement and even indicated that Stage 4 restrictions will remain in place regardless of AQI levels below 400. Five flights were diverted due to low visibility caused by the severe fog.
The Supreme Court of India has issued nationwide guidelines to prevent arbitrary demolitions of properties, aiming to curb the practice of ‘bulldozer justice’. The court emphasized the importance of due process and the right to be heard, stating that the executive cannot replace the judiciary in determining guilt and ordering demolitions.
The Supreme Court of India has delivered a significant ruling on the practice of ‘bulldozer actions’ by state governments, where properties belonging to individuals accused of crimes are demolished without due process. The court emphasized the importance of constitutional rights guaranteeing protection from arbitrary state action and the rule of law. This decision has implications for the balance between law enforcement and individual rights.
The Supreme Court of India has delivered its verdict on the controversial ‘bulldozer justice’ demolition drives, issuing pan-India guidelines for executing such actions and ordering compensation in a related case. The court’s decision comes after hearing petitions challenging the demolition of properties belonging to individuals accused in criminal cases, often without due process. The verdict emphasizes the importance of following legal procedures and safeguards against arbitrary demolitions.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna has taken the helm as India’s 51st Chief Justice, inheriting a docket of high-profile cases with potential to significantly impact the nation. From the criminalization of marital rape to Google’s antitrust battle and the e-gaming tax dispute, CJI Khanna will be at the center of crucial legal battles in the coming months. This article delves into the details of these cases and their potential implications.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna, a seasoned jurist with vast experience in diverse legal fields, has been appointed as the 51st Chief Justice of India. This article delves into his illustrious career, highlighting his key contributions and the journey that led him to the highest judicial office in the country.
The Supreme Court has ruled against the practice of state-run companies unilaterally appointing arbitrators, impacting the arbitration process for public sector units (PSUs) and potentially shifting the focus towards mediation. This decision, made on Chief Justice D. Y. Chandrachud’s last day in office, is a result of the finance ministry’s push to reduce PSU arbitration costs and reflects the government’s growing preference for mediation as an alternative dispute resolution method.
President-elect Donald Trump has announced his intention to expand the federal death penalty during his second term, targeting crimes like child rape, drug trafficking, and the killing of law enforcement officers. This stance has sparked concerns from criminal justice reform advocates and anti-death penalty groups, raising fears of a return to controversial policies seen during Trump’s first term. The article delves into the legal challenges, logistical hurdles, and potential implications of Trump’s proposed expansion, exploring the political landscape and the impact on existing reforms.
Outgoing Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud delivered a moving farewell message, recalling his father’s wise advice on maintaining integrity and the importance of personal space. He highlighted the significance of upholding moral and intellectual integrity, emphasizing the need for a ‘roof over one’s head’ in moments of compromise. The CJI also acknowledged the vulnerability of public figures in the digital age, emphasizing the importance of transparency and resilience in facing criticism.
