Trump’s Hush Money Trial Sheds Light on Shady Tabloid Journalism

The ongoing hush money trial of former President Donald Trump has lifted the lid on a murky corner of the media industry: pay-to-play tabloid journalism. During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump enjoyed close ties with the National Enquirer, headed by American Media Inc. CEO David Pecker. Pecker testified under oath that he actively sought to be Trump’s “eyes and ears,” engaging in a scheme to “catch” (buy the rights to) and “kill” (never publish) negative Trump stories. Trump is now accused of falsifying documents related to a payment made to Stormy Daniels to suppress her alleged affair with him. Pecker’s testimony highlights the disturbing tactics used by some tabloid outlets, including paying sources for stories and embellishing information to create salacious headlines. While there are arguments for compensating marginalized sources, the practice of buying stories is generally taboo in traditional newsrooms. The National Enquirer’s “checkbook journalism” approach raises concerns about the credibility and independence of such outlets.

Tabloid Tactics and Trump’s ‘Hush Money’ Trial: Pecker Reveals Election Swaying Scheme

In the ongoing ‘hush money’ trial against former US President Donald Trump, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified about a mutually beneficial arrangement between the tabloid and Trump’s campaign in the 2016 presidential election. The scheme involved the Enquirer promoting positive coverage of Trump while suppressing negative stories, particularly those involving women, to boost his chances of victory. Pecker described two instances where this strategy was implemented, involving a supposed love child with a Trump Tower maid and an affair with Playboy playmate Karen McDougal.

Scroll to Top