Kangana Ranaut, a prominent figure in Indian politics and a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has found herself at the center of a social media storm following her recent interviews. Her comments on Rahul Gandhi’s status as Leader of the Opposition and her remarks on the caste census have sparked widespread criticism and ridicule.
In a conversation with News24, Ranaut questioned Rahul Gandhi’s qualifications as the Leader of the Opposition, asking, “Why does Rahul Gandhi get the title of Leader of the Opposition? What achievement has he made?” Her statement, captured in a video clip that quickly went viral, prompted the TV anchor to explain the criteria for the position. When informed that Rahul Gandhi became LoP because the Congress party secured one-tenth of the seats in the Lok Sabha, Ranaut responded, “If you talk like this, then I do not have any answer for it.”
Her apparent lack of understanding about parliamentary procedures and her dismissal of the factual explanation ignited a wave of reactions on social media. Numerous users took to Twitter and other platforms to express their amusement, often mocking her knowledge and calling for psychiatric intervention. Comments like “On what basis she lost her mind?” and “Her psychological condition is not good” highlighted the widespread bewilderment at her statements. Others expressed concern about the impact on the BJP’s image, urging the party to take action.
The controversy did not end there. In a separate interview with LallanTop, Ranaut further fueled the fire by incorrectly identifying Ram Nath Kovind as the first Dalit President of India while discussing the caste census. The anchor promptly corrected her, stating that K.R. Narayanan held that distinction. Ranaut, acknowledging her mistake, apologized for the misinformation.
Kangana Ranaut’s recent pronouncements have once again placed her under the spotlight, showcasing the power of social media to amplify and dissect public figures’ actions. Her comments have provided fodder for online trolls, sparking a heated debate about political awareness, factual accuracy, and the potential consequences of public pronouncements in the digital age.
